Kenny Suitter explains the phrase "I Don't Answer Questions" and why it's in your best interest to incorporate it when interacting with police.

#kennysuitter #police #earthnewspaper

chromatose007
You should NEVER hand over your DL or re-gistration. Why? You DON'T need a DL to use your PERSONAL CONVEYANCE. DLs are ONLY for 'driving' for commercial purposes

hawkbyrd
Question: Why not just say, "I plead the fifth" rather than saying, "I don't answer questions"?

14west1
Because you are talking to a cop, not a judge.
The fifth amendment acknowledges your right to shut up and not answer questions.

Rob_Alderson
It's even easier here in the UK, you just have to say two words "NO COMMENT"

atama01
Defund the corrupt cops

UnClaimant
I was very young when I was born. They love that one. I had a cop tell me he wanted to contract with my birth certificate. By the end of our chat he wanted nothing more then to get away from me as soon as possible.

John__Dough
LMAO obvious feds/cops/ex cops getting super salty in the comments over a simple vid

Knowmoremrniceguy
sorry officer ,i cannot make a legal determination on what the fuck you are asking,and i am a moron and you can clearly see my lawyer is not present and he advised me to never answer questions,so i cannot help you. have a nice day.

The following article is from Robert Bruce:

Obviously the woman had the greatest intentions; but unfortunately she played right into the Policy Enforcer's hands - whether wilfully or ignorantly - I do not know.

Let us dissect this from a lawful perspective:

Variants of the USA's Miranda Rights are spoken by people in police uniforms in most countries, e.g: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."

Emphasis on "..Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.."

Much could be said on this event, but here are just a few time saving pointers:

1. Remember: 'Where there is no victim, there is no crime';
2. Those people wearing police uniforms are in fact Policy Enforcers - who are impersonating Peace Officers;
3. You are not morally obligated to answer people who support a provably immoral system;
4. You can give them your first name - if you wish. You may even say that you are standing there admiring the view - if you wish. But if they want to 'CONTRACT' with you by asking absurd and invasive questions such as "Are you praying in your mind?" etc, then you have every right to ask for a lawyer to be present, and at their expense. You made a BIG mistake by answering them (contracting with them), and played right into their hands;
5. If you are not: hurting anyone / stealing anything etc, and they demand to 'contract' with you by having you justify your standing there, then they have proven beyond all doubt that they wish to contract with you for nefarious reasons. So do not play into their hands by answering their absurd questions designed to entice you into contracting with them;
6. You have the right to ask: "Am I being detained?" They are likely to say: "No. We just want to know why you are standing there?" They are pressing you for this information so that they have a reason to persecute and prosecute you. Despite their response, ask again: "Am I being detained?" If they say "No", then you can say: "So I am free to leave?" If they keep asking you whether you were secretly praying, or thinking of eating hoky pokey ice-cream or buying a corgi dog, despite you asking if you are being detained and asking for a lawyer, then that is tantamount to wilful harassment on their part. Thus, do not answer any questions but demand a lawyer. At this stage they have already proven beyond all doubt that no matter how much you comply and assist them, it will be to your detriment;
7. Again, 'Where there is no victim, there is no crime';
8. And finally, the Policy Enforcers revealed their true intention by: s on "..Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.."
9. So stop talking to them...

D Doherty
A citizen can't stand on a street corner, yet hundreds of thousands of illegals can just wander up and down the country.

Jacek Owsianski
It's easier to arrest a quiet woman or an elderly preacher than to deal with real anti social behaviour of a group of bulky men or actual criminals.

AllAhabNoMoby
As Mark Steyn says, in the UK, everything is policed except crime.

Cypher791
Utterly disgusting… rampant crime under their nose and this is the kind of person they target for arrest…

Doug Phillips
10,000 people need to go to the same location and pray for that lady.

Lu B
This is an absolute disgrace. This officer and his mate have to be held accountable for what they have done!

Clark Blount
As long as you allow this type of tyranny, it will only continue to escalate.

Charles
This is absolutely disgusting. Thanks for making this video, showing and telling the people what's really going on !!

Sam Hilton
We need to hold a prayer vigil at this exact spot.

Cousin Zeke
NEVER speak to the police, EVER. "I won't answer any questions without a lawyer present." You give them anything else and they will use it against you.

Daniel Ettipio
The fact that he reached for the cane and pulled it out and the cop didnt even flinch tells me she had no fear that it was a gun in the first place. She just wanted to flex her ego

Harmzuay
The fact that the male officer could so casually tell his subordinate to put the guy in jail tells you all you need to know about this police department. This is definitely not the first time this has happened.

Mark Savage
I can't imagine how traumatic it must have been to be suspended for two days without pay. Thoughts and prayers

KobashiTV
How are they still employed? This is embarrassing.

TheMajorStranger
"Good morning sir. What's that in your back pocket?"
"It's a cane"
"Alright have a good day sir."

This shit could have been so simple.

Arran
I like that she answered the question "Are you a tyrant?" with the correct answer, "yes", and continued to prove it.

Donny H
When tyrant #2 said "put him in jail for resisting" it was an undeniable case of retaliation and that cop should be arrested for abuse of power

Demetrius
Absolutely lost it when he said he wanted their names and badge numbers and he replied "you can go to jail for resisting" and arrested him. like what the????

Jeffrey Kirk
What confuses me in all these videos is that the police know they are being recorded, but yet they still act like this.

K. Wild
"Now, was that so hard?"
> "It's going to be!"
Maaaan, they messed with a right one that day. Good for him!

Merzim Kuljancic
The way Mr.Hodges stayed calm and collected throughout the whole stop is just amazing. Hat off to you sir. This man did not make a single mistake during the whole interaction. Many would try to argue their way and raise their voice or something. He knew his rights and knew exactly what he was going to do as soon as he's released. Great Job!

Yukon Willeh
How she should have handled it
* sees its a walking stick * "oh crap, guess I'm the blind one"

Richard Cerrato
The satisfaction in the female officer's tone of voice as she arrests him shows that she really is a tyrant

Austin
Gotta really hand it to this guy for refusing unlawful commands, but also for not fleeing and making things worse. Handled it like an adult.

Gold trigger
TOP MAN WELL DONE !!

Pat McCaffery
That's how its done

Lola louise
I love how they think there's a blanket ban on swearing in public….A Public order offence can only apply if a member of the public is 1 in ear shot and 2 reports it to the police (which virtually never happens) but they sure do love to threaten us with it because they rely on most of the general public not knowing the law (much like them lol).

mrheavywater
The guy holding the camera doing the talking is an inspiration

Dragons Tooth
Amazing how governments act when they know there isnt a citizen with a gun waiting on the other side of the door.

Peter Van Kas
Great. A big thank you .

Tony Lynch
Well done to that man who is standing up for the people not the powers that should not be.

Jon Dickson
Wonderful stuff!!!
These tax funded criminals need removing from the streets!

ORBIT48auditing
Big up the bloke, for telling these Muppets, what's what! Thanks JP-UK, respect!

Seán Birss
That was a beautiful nonstop barrage of verbal truth.

karl draper
Hero of the people....we need a lot lot more like this! well done!

Lost in the world
What a bloke. Hat off to you sir, some hero's don't wear capes

Phil Flip
The problem with a situation like this is that the police do not know enough about the law so if the people who are trying to break into the house haven't followed the correct procedures they end up just taking the attitude that all is legit and anyone interfering is causing a breach of the peace etc.
The police should take the necessary steps to ascertain if the complainant is correct, make a call to HQ for advice upon the law but instead they just stand around and possibly aid and abet a break in!
If they do this then they will not in fact be guilty of such an offense since they were not acting in bad faith though they could be disciplined for not having checked up on the claims of the complainant.
If the correct procedures have not been followed then the book should be thrown at whatever parties failed to follow the correct procedures, GET COPIES OF ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE OF ANY FAILURE/REFUSAL TO SUPPLY THEM, THEN SUE THE SHIT OUT OF THE PEOPLE WHO CAUSED THE TRAVESTY.
I hear that putting bolts on your doors can be effective.

MAN EXERCISES COMMON LAW PERFECTLY WITH POLICE SHOW HOW TO PROTECT RIGHTS, uploaded from else where.

Robert Bruce
While the VERY BRAVE motorcyclist maybe right in so many ways, he is still dealing with a tyrannical system that may respond with extreme severity. The courts are terribly dangerous places to end up in, as the judiciary literally makes it up as they go. True Common Law is not based on court precedents or statute law; but rather, Natural Law that comes directly from our Creator.

Yashua (Jesus Christ) was the most innocent Man who walked the Earth; yet after being falsely accused He was sentenced to death - despite His innocence. (Note: Yashua could have used His power to negate the tyrants and eventual execution, but this was His predestined sacrifice for all mankind, the ultimate Gift of Love in God laying down His life for all of humanity past, present and future.)

CAUTION: Proverbs 26:17 "He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears."

WENDY
This guy is a legend. We need more real men like him.

Ed Eddie
Well done mate top job
Dont let these gestapo units bully citizens around

Sam Barr
Big up my boy. While I hope you don't have to endure this too often. I do hope you will keep us updated on future 'projects!' You Smoove my boy, you Smoove!

green gangster
Applause. Good on you buddy. Stand up for your rights

Niael Bryant
Leave people alone. No crime.

ElephantInTheSky
I watched a lot of the Freeman on the Land videos ten years ago and I began to study The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
I even tried a bit of the sovereignty Common Law thing in court myself.
I spent 10 years in Nimbin Australia and I watched every one who pursued the The I am a man and not a corporation and not a person thing end up in jail and jail is Hell. Who in their right mind would put themselves in Hell ?
The one thing I learned from years of studying the Law is that all Judges are corrupt. You cannot go into court and expect the Judge to follow the Law, because they don't, they make it up as they go and no respect for Common law or Constitutional Law.
I read the Holy Bible and the Local Law , parts of Criminal Codes and parts of Constitutional Law. I was turning into them so I quit, why give them my life.
I wasn't meant to spend my life reading legal nonsense, I was meant to be out doors with my dog.
I had so many arguments with Rangers and Police that I finally realised the best way to live is to have nothing to do with them.
Police have a habit of stalking teenage girls, everywhere teenage girls go the police follow. If a group of teenage girls go out drinking the police will be parked outside the pub etc..
if young girls go to a music concert the police will be waiting outside and occasionally sneak in to perve.
The police are perverts.
I have found that if you stay away from alcohol and music events and beaches on school holidays you don't run into the perverted police whom serve the rich.
If a Ranger does try to harass me I simply tell them that they are Extortionists and I leave.

Charlie Toko
This is what should be taught in our education system. Imagine if we the people took our power back from the cops that are programmed to intimidate us into complying even when we don't agree. Well done buddy one love from Brisbane.

somacinteriors
Surprised their heads didn't explode when you started talking about the law

Cupid Stunt's. STC Media.
Why did that cop feel the need to call for back up? There was no threat here, apart from his ignorance towards a fellow human.

Delta Movies HD
Hero's wear bike helmets in Australia, this man is our Mad Max.

Steven Thomas
Calm and articulate

First amendment audit, 1A, copwatch, walk of shame, id refusal, public photography, 1st amendment, we the people

Hadouken
The cop with the sun glasses looked like Mr Smith from The Matrix

TheUnseenSoldier
"Just doing a little journalism?"
- The cop who understands the assignment.

Oyantay Alvarez
Are you law enforcement? "Yes I am" - you're law enforcement not policy enforcement - had me cracking up

La di da di
"We can create real change by filming inside of a building legally. " - MLK.

David McPhail
I was absolutely SHOCKED AND WET MYSELF when that sergeant came out of the office and basically said, "Sure you can film. Have a nice day!"

Charlie Foxtrot
I love how taping in a Dmv is real change. You are the real hero.

Skeet Skeet
Thought the guy wearing sunglasses was about to reply; "Hello, Mr. Anderson".

Troy Kleiner
our local court house has a sign saying no recording in the court room but everything is supposed to be recorded for public records and they have video surveillance everywhere but if we record they can't edit out what really happens

Last week I questioned Fair Work Australia about their commissioners.

I have sworn affidavits from people saying one Vice President was heard saying on the phone that she wouldn't let an unvaccinated person look after her grandchildren.

I also asked why commissioners aren't listening to expert advice representing sacked workers. Commissioners are just washing their hands of any evidence as to whether or not the Covid vaccine is fit for purpose.

On more than one occasion ATAGI has said the vaccine reduces transmission when in fact the FDA said as far back as December 2020 that there is no evidence of that.

Despite this, the Commissioners still have the gall to say they are relying on the experts. It should be noted that most of these experts on the ATAGI board work for organizations that receive funding from big pharmaceuticals or the Gates foundation.

The take out from this is that you should complain about your decision and the Commissioners relying on false information to the FWC.

I was pleased to hear the FWC President Iain Ross is resigning. He was a former union hack in his prior life before being appointed by Julia Gillard.

Along with Paul Keating and Bill Kelty he designed compulsory superannuation. It's no coincidence he also oversaw the compulsory vaccine's. A leopard doesn't change his spots.

Voodoo
Much Respect Senator. Finally Someone is willing to Stand up to these Word Salad Manipulating Clowns.

Tom Mullins
These bureaucrats lie like hell in senate estimates. We need them in a court of law.

Top G
Man this senator has some patience with these oxygen theifs. Also thank you for actually doing your job Senator.

Tony Had enough
Thank you Senator, you are our voice. We the Australian people are no longer allowed to use our voice, otherwise we may lose our jobs, or charged for voicing our opinions. Everyone, and I mean everyone in Australia that's still asleep needs to wake up and actually see what is going on. There is still too many people still asleep and brainwashed to realise what is really happening.

Robochop 1987
Dear Senator, I lost my job, or rather career, on Jan 5 this year.
I was a senior allied health professional for ten years with the same employer. I was told by them I had to be jabbed by Jan 14 or be sacked. I was also threatened that if i stayed onsite and ignored the direction they would take action (whatever that may have been). I was forced into a situation where my only choice was to resign because of what corruption I saw occurring everywhere else where other health workers were being stood down and not paid. My long service leave came up on Jan 3 therefore I resigned effective Jan 5 (with a very heavy heart) to claim that as I had no other money or anything else. It was a complex situation but one in which I had to maneuver to be able to provide for my wife and three children.
Cut a long story short, I was told to leave my workplace by a certain date to work from home for the last two and a half weeks of my job because I was unjabbed. So, as an apparent 'allied health professional ' I found myself working from my garage. There was absolutely no regard or two hoots from an employer which would not usually consider this appropriate.
Leading up to this my union bailed on me (gutless wonders) having been onboard with the covid lies. In addition, Fairwork didnt want to know me either as I had put in a complaint about my harrasment from HR about the coerced bioweapon injection. Zero assistance at all from anyone, it was like all the rats had jumped ship when it all got too hard to advocate for employees who just had their human rights walked right over.
To top it off, on my last day I suffered through a video call with my team leader who's last request was that I put an 'out of office message' on my emails now that I wasnt going to be there. Yes, an out of office message....
Such is the mentality of these tyrants who are mesmorised by fear and the corrupt Govt agenda.

Edit: I do not collect any form of Centrelink payments neither have I since I lost my income. We have had to sell our personal belongings to survive. That is our choice I understand that, however having been treated like garbage by this Govt I could not stomach lining up for payments from the exact tyrants who put us in this position. It is physically and mentally exhausting.

Mister Holdsworth
Whoever voted for this bloke, thank you. He seems to be the only one working for us and asking all the right questions.

channelhismojo
There needs to be class action lawsuits before these people slither away.

ArrestKlausSchwab-rejectreset
I want EVERY Aussie employee that was sacked for not getting jabbed to be paid full back pay from their employer as well as compensation from the commonwealth.

Ryan Anastasia Quinn
I lost my job over the mandate Senator , a shocking conclusion to over 10 years of service ... I fought with them over email and stated I technically still had my job and so they demounted me to a casual and only 4 hours a week ... Ruined me ... took me ages to find unvaccinated work... I have recently dealt with fair work over a pay dispute... of which they were no help ... so I didn't even bother contacting them over it ... though I should have ... so not only did the government screw me with mandates they also debted me 12 500 dollars of which I had to pay back to Centrelink for no reason robodebt... I've tried to pick myself up as a man but it's hard when u get beat down so much from the people whom are supposed to look after you....

EVERY natural man and woman is born "in the private". Whereas the State is public, and therefore its Public Servants, and its legal fiction creations are "in the public", including its artificial legal "persons".

A man or woman can either "live" "in the private", or "act" "in the public". However ...

We are trained from an early age to accept a higher authority as normal. Most people exist in a culture of submission and conformity, allowing numerous aspects of their lives to be controlled by the Government. The populace is manipulated to become dependent (debt-money), and conditioned to become fearful (racism, terrorism, and wars). The manner and appearance of "authority" is usually intimidating by design, while the language of legal fiction commerce (Legalese) is deceptive.

You are indoctrinated to "act" in the "role" of an artificial legal "person", which is a creation of the State and a debtor serving as "surety" for the corporate debt of YOURNATION (INC.).

Every nation with a Central Bank under the Bank for International Settlements has been indebted by the "incorporation" of its government into the debt-money system, thereby surrendering its power of sovereign money issuance.

A global system of debt-bondage has been established by "incorporating" governments, and by programming the people to "act" in the fictional "roles" of "artificial persons", which as legal fictions having no innate productive capacity, are debtors by default, serving as "transmitting utilities" for human energy.

An artificial legal "person" is a dead entity. It is a legal fiction "persona" in the "theatre of commerce", and it is under the foreign Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, the international "Law of the Sea". On the contrary, you are born into your own sovereign Estate of body, mind, and soul. As a sentient man or woman you live within the sovereign Common Law Jurisdiction, the national "Law of the Land".

The "Common Law" follows "Natural Law", a living system of "right or justice" held to be common to all humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society. In "Natural Law", all people are born equal and endowed with unalienable rights.

Your sovereign jurisdiction, including your inborn Unalienable Rights, cannot be taken from you without your fully informed and willing consent.

Legal "person" "actors" for incorporated governments, banks, and all corporate entities, need to contract with other legal "person" "actors" to extract their "commercial energy".

These legal "actors" make the PRESUMPTION that you are also "acting" in the "role" of a legal "person" in "legal fiction" commerce, which is why they are seeking a contract "performance". They ALWAYS want the NAME and often the creation date of the legal "person" to establish "joinder", forming an "adhesion contract". They NEED A "PERSON", because there is absolutely no way they can contract directly with a living man or woman. They need a man or woman to CONSENT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MATTER OF THE "PERSON", unknowingly or knowingly, which is JOINDER.

In this way, a man or woman becomes party to the action involving the "person", which is "joinder" of the parties into a single case in legal fiction commerce.

When a living name is "mirrored" by the registration of an artificial legal "person" on the Birth Certificate, an Estate Trust is formed, such as MR JOHN DOE TRUST. Any living man or woman unknowingly in JOINDER to such a legal fiction NAME blindly takes responsibility for the alleged debts of the Trust as its Trustee. Whereas an aware living man or woman can separate themselves from the legal fiction NAME and become the rightful controlling Agent, Beneficiary, Executor/Executrix for MR JOHN DOE TRUST.

Legal "actors" will attempt to engage the "person" by posting letters, by phone, or on the highway, to make and enforce a contract. Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional "person" causing unwitting "joinder" is the crime of "personage", and it is perpetuated by "barratry", the crime of bringing false claims in court. The term "barratry", appropriately, comes from the "Bar Association".

Under the Common Law Jurisdiction (Law of the Land), both parties must enter into every contract "knowingly", "voluntarily", and "intentionally", or the contract is unenforceable and void.

However, under the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction (Law of the Sea), consent to contract is often presumed by silent acquiescence, unless the party contracted thereby rebuts the presumption of consent.

If you do not wish to consent to their contract offer (presentment), you must Rebut The Presumption that you are "acting" in the "role" of a fictional legal "person".

The first step is to separate yourself from the legal fiction. If you answer to the artificial legal "person" NAME, you contract by "joinder" to become a liable debtor. However, if you "stand" truthfully as a "man" or "woman", not "acting" as an artificial legal "person", the two are separated.

Because of years of conditioning, it takes time to separate the legal fiction from reality, in your mind and in the real world. A powerful and lawful approach is simply to verify everything.

You are never obliged to answer questions or to provide government issued ID. Truly, to uphold your government of the People, it is not your duty to answer questions, it is your duty to ask questions. You have the Right to know who is making a claim against you, the Right to know who the injured party is, the Right to conditionally accept any claim against you upon verification, the Right to reserve your rights without prejudice, and thereafter the Right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination.

By failing to exercise their Rights, the People have been betrayed, and have allowed their governance to be turned against them, so that the People have been "monetized". The original offices of de jure unincorporated government institutions have been usurped, and are mostly unoccupied by de jure public servants working for the People in a de jure public capacity. The "public" State has been captured by financial piracy, and has become a commercial enterprise, operating by contract under the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction (Law Merchant), in the international Law of the Sea.

The following definitions apply to the de facto incorporated State, in which the agencies of government, and all artificial legal "persons", are merely corporate franchises.

Private: To be "in the private" is to "live" in a "private capacity" as a Man or Woman, with flesh and blood, arms and legs, a conscious mind, a spirit, and Life. All Men and Women are created as equal Sovereigns, endowed with Unalienable Rights and Properties, including Credit equating to their valuable human energy. As natural Men and Women, they are Creditors, because they are born naturally with innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Unlimited, and they have unlimited liability, being responsible adults. They are outside and above the State. From Latin privatus "set apart, belonging to oneself (not to the state)".

Public: To be "in the public" is to "act" in a "public capacity" as an "accommodation party" in "joinder" to an "artificial person" created and governed by the State. All Men and Women who "act" in legal fiction "roles" for the State are granted revocable Privileges and Benefits prescribed in legislative "Acts". As Artificial Persons, they are Debtors, because they are created legally without innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Limited, and they have limited liability, being legally incompetent "creatures of the State", its legal children. They are inside and under the State. From Latin publicus "of the people; of the state; done for the state".

If you have COVID fines pending…don't back down! If you know people who do, send this to them!

You are a human being with rights, and NO ONE should ever justify why they left the house without a piece of cloth over their face or were in a group larger than ten.

On October 31st, 2020, I was arrested THREE times in one day, put in the back of a police van for 45 mins, and fined thousands of dollars just for leaving my house.

After more than two years of fighting these embarrassing fines, the prosecutors dropped the charges with NO explanation.

I was prepared and wanted a chance to set the record straight but they never give us the opportunity! They don't want their actions being questioned in open court. They try to intimidate you and when they realise you aren't backing down, they drop the charges.

Moral of the story...DON'T BACK DOWN

Vincent Banh
They must hate the fact you document everything. Publishing on the internet holds them accountable permanently!

Karen Naropa Baker
"You guys would have taken my money and run away laughing "
It is an international embarrassment

Jenny Groves
What a dismal justice system
Someone needs to be held accountable

Tracey Lee
Well said Monica, absolutely horrific what you and many others went through.

ariesred777
The courts need to be overhauled No one knows what's they're doing!

Linda Harper
We need to organise a class action for stress, anxiety, physical abuse, etc

cliff fowler
Congratulations Monica.... now ya gotta hit them up for the rest and the stress......
Well done so far young freedom fighter... we're all behind you.

Thomas
We're not dealing with human beings here. They will never feel remorse or feel bad about what they did.. they actually love it. They're sadists.. these people are infiltrated by certain entities.

Tlb
Unbelievable what they put you through and many others for no reason, how inhumane can they be. We have to keep fighting the scumbags. God keep you safe Monica, stay strong

Mitchell George
Monica, I wish I had your self control. Maximum respect to you. Ooft.

sharles b
I feel your frustration, you are so right in wanting an explanation and them admitting it was wrong, but she made it sound like you got off on a technicality because the wrong number was used. If they had an ounce of decency, they should be back tracking and refunding every Covid bs fine, but they won't admit they made a mistake and own the bs they put people through. I have lost all respect for police.

A secret loophole allows you to pay NO tax in Australia. What is this loophole, and how can you use it? In Australia, if you are a hobby and don't register as a business, you pay no tax!

Chapters
0:00 Don't pay tax in Australia
0:10 Are you in business?
0:21 ATO does not tax hobbies
0:30 Do I have to pay tax on my Etsy store, YouTube, or Blog?
0:43 Other types of hobbies
0:56 Are you running a business or a hobby?
1:07 Duck tests
1:17 No one single test whether you're in business
1:32 Operating in a businesslike manner
1:42 Registering a business name in Australia
1:57 Hobby? Don't register a business name
2:07 Can a hobby have a website, logo, and social media?
2:31 Does a hobby need an ABN: Australia Business Number?
2:44 What's the most profitable online business?
2:54 No ABN Withholding
3:45 Applying for an ABN
4:17 Statement by a supplier form
5:04 Not expecting to make a profit: business or hobby?
5:32 Size and scale test: hobby vs business
5:55 A business needs a separate bank account
6:25 Separate premises test
7:01 Advantages of being a hobby vs business
7:50 Tax-free threshold in Australia
8:27 Who determines whether you're a business or a hobby?
8:59 Don't lodge your tax return now

#sebastianstjames

@SebastianStJames
Watch next: It's Tax Time: Why You Shouldn't Lodge Your Tax Return Right Now - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeZvz_ClJts

@R.E.A.L.I.T.Y
Chevron have a great hobby on Barrow Island.

@Thisbook2022
So much insight. As usual!

@Jasper_Jackson
Really nice video. I thought even hobby busisnesses had to pay tax. I am learning so much from you!

@R.E.A.L.I.T.Y
Very useful & it really quacked me up.

This is a powerful and informative interview with Rachel Mortimer, a senior teacher and Head of Faculty, who is actively part of NZTSOS (New Zealand Teachers Speaking Out with Science.)

She wants you to know about an important case in the New Zealand high court starting next Thursday for the mandated teachers and doctors of NZ. This is hot on the heels of another High Court ruling on Thursday that the vaccine mandates for Police and Defence Force staff were unlawful.

…

Please help Counterspin Media bring you the facts and truths by donating at https://counterspinmedia.com/donate

…

DO YOU KNOW ANYONE WHO HAS JAB-REACTIONS or suffering shedding? Visit https://brilin.co.nz for information on upcoming webinars.

What is a Freedom Claim Affidavit, and why do I need one?

William Bisset interviews Shelley Richardson, creator of the 'I Love My Freedom' – Freedom-Claim Affidavit.

Take 30 minutes out of your busy schedule to sit and watch this video through.
This has answers to information a lot of people are talking about right now.
Gain understanding on the importance of this document and what it can provide to you and others, in these challenging times.

If you have more questions, please Contact Shelley on www.ILoveMyFreedom.co.nz

Are you OK with this?

Are you OK with individuals having to choose between feeding their families and undergoing a potentially fatal experimental medical procedure which has shown to have a negative benefit. In other words, not only are the C-19 injections harmful but they may worsen Covid-19, alter immunity and destroy herd immunity, not to speak of the adverse events. All this for a flu-like illness for which being healthy is the best defence.

Are you OK with young children being injected with an experimental intervention for a disease, no greater than the sniffles and that does not protect their families?

Around the world, citizens are standing up.

We understand that it is a difficult time. Families and communities have been needlessly torn apart. Speaking out risks loss, anger and humiliation.

However, not speaking out is being complicit; complicit in tyranny, coercion, removal of choice and censorship.

The main premise is to place those complicit with supporting and/or administering the injections on notice and make them aware of the harm they are causing by continuing the vaccine roll out. The evidence supporting the dangers of the injections is overwhelming and those supporting the injection need to be made aware of these dangers and avoid causing harm by their action or inaction. The failure to inform and warn the people of New Zealand is considered a failure to act to prevent harm. It is thus our duty to raise awareness among those complicit.

The server of the NoL (Notice of Liability) has a duty to warn the people of NZ of the harm caused to them. The recipient has a duty to comprehend the content of the NoL and either counter the warning or cease and desist from causing harm. Serving the NoL prevents the recipient from having "plausible deniability" meaning the recipient cannot claim they did not know or comprehend the dangers caused by the vaccination. A counter claim or rebuttal must be submitted in order to defend their position. A judge must recognise this as a lawful process and costs cannot be awarded if a chance to raise a counter claim and rebuttal was provided but not carried out.

The main premise is to place those complicit with supporting and/or administering the injections on notice and make them aware of the harm they are causing by continuing the vaccine roll out. The evidence supporting the dangers of the injections is overwhelming and those supporting the injection need to be made aware of these dangers and avoid causing harm by their action or inaction. The failure to inform and warn the people of New Zealand is considered a failure to act to prevent harm. It is thus our duty to raise awareness among those complicit.

The server of the NoL has a duty to warn the people of NZ of the harm caused to them. The recipient has a duty to comprehend the content of the NoL and either counter the warning or cease and desist from causing harm. Serving the NoL prevents the recipient from having "plausible deniability" meaning the recipient cannot claim they did not know or comprehend the dangers caused by the vaccination. A counter claim or rebuttal must be submitted in order to defend their position. A judge must recognise this as a lawful process and costs cannot be awarded if a chance to raise a counter claim and rebuttal was provided but not carried out.

A Notice of Liability can be served to any organisation or business that is administering the injection and / or requiring a vaccine passport. We suggest serving school boards and principals and vaccine centres. Small businesses, such as cafes can be served but please be polite and compassionate to your fellow human beings.

Keep notes and photos in your organisations of who has been served. We are working with other groups to set up a database / portal and will advise via our newsletter and website at the time. If people say they have been served but there is doubt, do it again. It has been suggested that recipients are served three times.

Conversation

Here is a suggested conversation from the World Council for Health legal committee.

"Hi

I've come in to help you avoid criminal charges. Please be advised.

I/we are here to serve a Cease and Desist legal notice on you /persons in this facility, with regards to the C19 jabs.

You are hereby informed that these jabs are dangerous experiments, which global experts are raising alarm bells about, because they can and do cause injury and death. Criminal cases have been launched overseas in this regard. Over 300 people in New Zealand have died following these jabs, including children, most without any investigations by the government.

This document also contains a personal notice of liability, should any person be injured or killed as a result of jabs being administered here/or customers/clients being discriminated against based on jab status (USE WHICHEVER IS APPROPRIATE TO VENUE) by anyone.

Please take the time to read this document, and lets do what is right to protect health and lives. Even if if you disagree that there is a problem, events may prove you wrong in retrospect.

Please sign this document as acknowledgment of receipt. If you refuse to do so, I/we will affix the legal notice to the door of this facility, and take a photograph and video as evidence of service.

Thank you for cooperating. You can find more information at the following websites: worldcouncilforhealth.org and NZDSOS.com"

You can also say (although it is written) "that ignorance ie not reading the notice, is no protection." You can reiterate that "you are trying to help them avoid legal action."

Suggestions

While you can video the encounter, you don't need to. You can just make a recording of you handing the notice to the individual(s) and emphasise you are protecting their privacy, beyond writing their name.

You can also remind them (not essential) that the employer can be held vicariously liable for actions of the employees.

In the early "field trials" in the vaccine centers and businesses in South Canterbury, about 80% of recipients have been friendly / embarrassed / shocked or curious. About 20% have refused to engage or have been stroppy.

Be prepared that vaccine centres and medical centres may be pre-prepared, saying, that this is not legal and to leave the premises. The document can be placed on the ground a meter away from them and it is served. Photo evidence would be helpful. The notice can be taped to the door or entrance-way with identifying features of the business included in the photo.

It is advisable to present a notice in a group of two or three, but try not to talk over each other and listen respectfully. The document does the talking, you just need to give it to them. Obviously, some chats may take place, and many business owners may confide they are trapped into cooperating with the government. However, they still make a choice that may have consequences for them. Some may feel they need to download their situations and feelings to you.

Please be prepared to don a mask if someone seems genuinely frightened of you or they ask, and you can cope with it. The victory is by the serving the notice, not through a battle of wills.

You might also ask if they personally know of any friends, family or co-workers who have been injured. You can emphasise that it is very unusual for this level of injuries to be associated with a vaccine roll-out. Be careful not to be giving inappropriate medical, political or conspiracy comment. This is purely a legal document.

If the individual refuses to sign, just write the name of the business, and the time and date so that in court the business's roster can be used to identify who was present. If it was a frightened underling, tell them to pass it on to the boss so their responsibility is devolved, and to record they have done so.

If placed on the floor within a meter of the person or on the door it is deemed served.

Thank them for giving you the chance to help them, even if they are stroppy. Many will read the document once you have left. Reports from the UK indicate that angry recipients after throwing the notice in the bin, pull it out later when they thought no-one was looking.

williamfehr3rd
I'm done with corporate Nazi's who have no concerns for their fellow citizens

valeriehoughton
Standing up for themselves & the sovereignty of their land- "We are the beneficiaries- we are not violent. I need all of your names & numbers so you can be discharged." God be with you.

jamieibbett
Look at these turnips trying to get their call of duty on .....they need to grow up .

rei_hino__
That dogs like I'll see you the f*ck off my yard thanks

davidbmonteiro
Boss level right there! Listen and learn those words!

You need to place yourself outside of Maritime Jurisdiction, and place yourself back into Physical Land Law.

The way you do this is by REMAINING SILENT.

If someone asks you a question, whether it is a policeman, someone in the court room, or a council, you can simply say: "I would like to remain silent."

If they continually pressure you, say: "Do I have the right to remain silent?"

They will say: "Yes of course you do..." and then remain silent. Do NOT say your name and do not sign anything.